About Facilitated Mentoring
|
With your stack of mentor and mentee applications in hand, you are ready to enter into the selection and matching process. First review each application to make sure that you have all the information you have requested. Applications should be screened for preliminary acceptance into the program based on the applicant's readiness, potential and suitability for participation. If an applicant leaves key sections blank, or does not lead you to feel that they have a clear sense of the program's purpose and goals as well as their own purpose and goals for participation, you will need to decide if you want to request further information or disqualify them. It is recommended that you talk with those that you feel have promise but whose applications may not show their best selves. These may be just the type of participants who could benefit most. You may also choose to conduct additional phone interviews with candidates, depending on the number of applicants and your available resources. This is often helpful for gathering additional information. Some candidates may not answer the questions well in written format, and may provide significant and helpful information through a personal discussion. In the end you will need to select those candidates who show the greatest readiness and commitment. The IAA conducted both the written application and oral interview processes for their candidates. Secondary screening should be aimed at determining how the applicants' expressed needs can be met within the available pool. If you find that there are applicants that you do not feel you can place, it is better to inform them that a "suitable match is not available at this time" than to force a match that is not likely to work. Remember that being successful in one's career does not automatically make one a good mentor. Conversely, all emerging or mid-career professionals do not make good mentees. Those mentors or mentees who appear ridged in their expectations, unable to flow with the matching process or judgmental with regards to persons of a different generation, working in different arts disciplines or particular organizations, may not be the most open to this kind of professional development experience. IAA has a stated selection criterion that they can use internally as well as include on the mentor/mentee applications. Thus, applicants can fully understand how their application will be reviewed as well as know that a limited number of participants will be selected. In addition to the individual criteria, IAA strives to ensure that the participant pool encompasses a balanced representation of artistic disciplines, organizational size, gender and race/ethnicity. Mentor Criteria
Mentee Criteria
With your select pool of applicants in place, it is time to pair your partners. There are several different ways to match mentors and mentees.
There are no right ways to implement the matching process. Identifying a method that is comfortable for you and your committee is the key. IAA's planning committee developed a strategy that incorporates several of these practices*:
You may need to explain to the participants or others how you made the matches and you must feel that your process is sound, fair and easily understood. It is also important for them to understand that that we do not always learn the most from people who are exactly like us. Sometimes, the most knowledge can be gained from someone we might consider our opposite. If you choose not to allow mentees to make their own selections or if the organizing committee will not to be guided by their preferences, you will need to agree on a strategy that fits within your needs. This can be done through a pairing of those who have complementary goals and purposes for participation as well as mentors with experience that could be most beneficial to mentees, based on his or her stated needs. It must also be said that some part of the pairing process is intuitive. Having knowledge of the community and those who work in it can be very helpful for knowing who might make a good match based on the applicant information and personal interviews. This process is first and foremost about creating a relationship between two people who seek to gain something through the exchange of ideas, experience and information. There are no formulas to ensure a perfect match. Ultimately the most successful matches are between people who share similar goals, desired outcomes and values and whose expectations for the program participation are aligned. The first step towards accomplishing this is to be sure that the matching process has been implemented in a way that connects those with similar expectations, goals and desired outcomes. Keep in mind that some of these outcomes will be intrinsic rather than overtly measurable. A careful application and interview phase should help make identifying congruencies easier.
Once the matches are made, each member of a suggested pair should be asked to formally accept the match before it is finalized. This could include the exchange of summarized information about the person with whom one is matched and some specific notes about why the particular match was made. For example: Allow each participant to discuss the match with you or an appropriate member of the organizing committee before they accept it. Sometimes someone who is unhappy with the choice initially can feel more confident when the selection process and the reasons for the match are explained. If the participant is unwilling to accept a match, you may have to ask them to apply in a future program period if there are no other available and appropriate matches for this year. While you hope that every match you make results in a state of pure mentoring bliss, it is important to realize that sometimes the chemistry just is not there. There should always be an option for a participant to ask for a no-fault separation from his or her mentoring partner. When this happens:
*Because the number of mentor applicants was lower than expected for the pilot year of IAA's program, members of the planning committee identified likely mentors based on the stated needs of selected mentee applicants. When mentors were recruited, they were informed which mentee we wished to match them with and why. If the mentor expressed interest in participating, mentees were then notified and asked to approve the match.
Illinois Arts Alliance/Foundation |
||